Dismissal of AI profitability skepticism as geopolitical shilling
Key claims
- Critics claiming AI is unprofitable are Chinese state agents; AI will eventually prove valuable like historical technologies.
- User asserts that skepticism toward AI capability is concentrated among non-technical and humanities-focused people, while hard-science experts recognize AI competence.
Volume over time
Peak 1 mentions/hour · 2 hourly buckets
Source threads (2)
Every thread this story was extracted from, with live and archive links so the evidence is verifiable.
- /g/109284829 ↗ live · archive dismissive evergreen 69 replies Critics claiming AI is unprofitable are Chinese state agents; AI will eventually prove valuable like historical technologies.
- /g/109286805 ↗ live · archive dismissive evergreen 5 replies User asserts that skepticism toward AI capability is concentrated among non-technical and humanities-focused people, while hard-science experts recognize AI competence.
Related stories
- Google Search AI misidentifies people in query results 10 mentions · shared: ai
- User exploring psychological need to believe in domains resistant to AI automation 1 mentions · shared: ai
- Google removes search operators from Advanced Search 1 mentions
- Question about purchasing Chinese-manufactured RAM 2 mentions · shared: china
- AI replacement of animation jobs at Pixar 1 mentions · shared: ai
- Philosophical comparison of AI safety concerns to service dog behavioral risk 1 mentions · shared: ai